New Book Proves President Obama Not a Natural-Born US Citizen
San Carlos, CA (PRWEB) October 01, 2012
Just in time for the 2012 presidential elections, author Bob Gard has released an eBook that sheds light on a controversy that, over the last few years, has become a grim contest of political wills. The book offers a historically verified definition of the term "natural born citizen" as it appears in the presidential eligibility clause in Section 1 of Article II of the Constitution.
With the ponderous but eminently
searchable title of "On Gard, Obama, You Are An Unconstitutional
President Because You Are Not A Natural-Born Citizen, Which I Shall
Prove Beyond A Reasonable Doubt," this 1,722-page volume lays out
conclusive, verbatim evidence that the reader can analyze independently
of the writer's own opinions. Available at Amazon.com,
the eBook can be downloaded on PCs in the Microsoft Word™ 2010 “docx”
file format. The 175-megabyte file requires a longer-than-average
downloading time, and some readers may experience intermittent warnings
of “not responding.” Author Bob Gard says, "The wait will be worth it for those who wish to follow a path back to constitutionality."
Bob Gard is the first person who
pieces together this comprehensive definition of natural-born
citizenship using both correlative and corroborative evidence. For more
than 220 years, much of this evidence has been readily available within
the public domain, but no one has yet brought the parts together into a
conclusive whole. In order to define natural-born citizenship, this book
traces how the law of nature, the law of nations, the British legal
system and the American legal system have evolved through the course of
history. "The evidence proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Barack Hussein Obama's
claim to presidential office is unconstitutional due to his violation
of the Constitution’s presidential eligibility clause," Gard says.
The pieces of this puzzle are
drawn from five centuries of books and documents that cost the author
over $30,000 to acquire, as well as citations from a myriad of archives
in libraries around the world. This book's size results from numerous
extended quotations and images that establish the provenance of the
documents in question. Compelled by an imperative desire for readers to
draw their own conclusions, the author has risked alienating many who
would be put off by such a lengthy work. "In a time where revisionist
spin doctors truncate documents, cite quotes out of context, and simply
rewrite history as they see fit, I wanted to remain as true to the
research as possible," Gard says. "Those who read this book will
rapidly understand the necessity of including so many links in the chain
of evidence."
According to the book, the true
and historically valid definition of the term "natural born citizen"
disqualifies President Obama from running for reelection in the upcoming
presidential elections.
-Bob GardThere have been quite few people that have brought up an argument by stating that President Obama is not actually a natural born citizen, even though his documentation proves otherwise. These individuals, who are almost entirely members of the republican party, are making claims about Obama's nationality because of his full name, Barack Hussein Obama, and because of his skin color. One can be certain that these claims wouldn't be thrown around if Obama had been a white man running for office. Many people that voted against Obama claimed to not know much about his policies, but instead decided to vote against him because of his skin color and this idea that "he is unconstitutional president." This idea of racialization can be connected to Bonilla-Silva's text.
I see how this is a racialized view of Obama, and it is because of what these people have defined as an American. They don't accept him holding an office of power above them, when he is not an American. This easily shows how an American is defined as white, with names that do not have a questionable origin.
ReplyDeleteI believe it is disappointing when our own president has to suffer from being a legal citizen, but is not recognized as a cultural citizen. Even in this modern age where we are supposedly very accepting, cultural citizenship could be denied to any person believed to be foreign because of their appearance.